The Climate is always changing and man has zero control over it. From 800 AD to about 1300 AD the Earth went through a global warming period that was 1.5 degrees warmer than now as the ice core record shows below. During this warm period in about 1000 AD the Vikings discovered Greenland, named because of its warm tropical green vine covered climate. Europe had open trade with Greenland Vikings for centuries until the little ice age kicked in because of the Maunder Minimum Sun Spot cycle. And cut off trade with Greenland for Centuries. Contributing to the starvation of the Viking colonies there in Greenland. Which is now covered in ICE.

This graph was published by he IPCC in 1996.

During this 500 year long warm period England and Northern Europe was so warm that Grapes were grown as far north as Scotland. Wine was the top export from these regions. Agriculture flourished, people prospered and this became the period in time when the great Cathedrals were built.

Do you really want to prevent Global Warming?

These are the things wrong with preventing Global Warming: 

 1) The life diversity of species in the warmer climates are billions of times that compared to the Ar tic and Antarctic. If global warming will cause mass extinctions prove it! 

 2) According to the University of Copenhagen and American CDC reports there are 20 times as many people killed by cold and winter related deaths like hypothermia than from heat related deaths in the summer time. Yet Global Warming Propagandist only report heat related deaths while intentionally ignoring winter related deaths. 

 3) When the ice packs expand every species looses, when ice packs retreat every species wins, including polar bears. Nothing grows on the ice, not even trees or grass. 

 4) If Global Warming is supposed to cause this period of mass extinctions why do all migrating species head south during the winter time, to escape the cold and seek out the warmer summer months in the southern hemisphere during our winter.

Climate Audit on Hurricanes

http://www.climateaudit.org/?cat=32
2007 Blown off track: Northern Hemisphere Historic Cyclone Inactivity
By ryanm
Ryan Maue writes in as follows (see also 2007 Tropical Cyclone Activity).
As reported at Climate Audit at the end of October, the North Atlantic was not the only ocean seeing quiet tropical cyclone activity. When using the ACE cyclone energy scale, the Northern Hemisphere as a whole is historically inactive. How inactive? One has to go back to 1977 to find lower levels. Even more astounding, 2007 will be the 4th slowest year in the past half-century (since 1958).
The 2007 Atlantic Hurricane season did not meet the hyperactive expectations of the storm pontificators. This is good news, just like it was last year. With the breathless media coverage prior to the 2006 and 2007 seasons predicting catastrophic swarms of hurricanes potentially enhanced by global warming a la Katrina, there is currently plenty of twisting in the wind to explain away the hyperbolic projections. The predominant refrain mentions something about “being lucky” and having “escaped” the storms, and “just wait for next year”.

Well before we prepare for the obvious impending onslaught of the next “above-average” hurricane season, let’s review some very positive aspects of what 2007 offered:
When combined, the 2006 and 2007 Atlantic Hurricane Seasons are the least active since 1993 and 1994. When compared with the active period of 1995-2005 average, 2006 and 2007 hurricane energy was less than half of that previous 10 year average. The most recent active period of Atlantic hurricane activity began in 1995, but has been decidedly less active during the previous two seasons.
When combined, the Eastern Pacific and the North Atlantic, which typically play opposite tunes when it comes to yearly activity (b/c of El Nino), brushed climatology aside and together managed the lowest output since 1977. In fact, the average lifespan of the 2007 Atlantic storms was the shortest since 1977 at just over two days. This means that the storms were weak and short-lived, with a few obvious exceptions.

So, before throwing Dr. Gray, NOAA, and Accuweather under the bus, consider what seasonal forecasting must entail to skillfully project hurricane activity. Then consider what we do not know well:
Why are there 80-90 tropical cyclones each year globally?
Will a given storm rapidly intensify or weaken – prior to landfall several days ahead of time?
What mechanism(s) determine when and where a tropical depression will form and how far in advance can we say for sure?
Now, when a seasonal prediction is made, elements of the above questions enter into play: One, two, three, or six months ahead of the season, how many storms will form, how strong will they be, and what is the probability that any of those will affect land (particularly the United States). This requires knowledge of oceanic conditions half-way around the world, precipitation patterns over Africa, and a host of other considerations.
Nevertheless, do not lose heart. Long-range weather prediction is a booming enterprise, with energy, insurance, and governmental agencies investing considerable resources into this colossal effort. The house always wins.

Find a professional Climatologist that isn't dependant on Government Grants for their pay check and findout if Global Warming is real.

Global Warming Questioning Seasons

If Global Warming is going to cause mass extinctions why do all the animals migrate south for the winter time to escape the cold and seek out the warmer summer months in the Southern Hemisphere?

Global Warming Question

If Global Warming is supposed to bring about all this great period of extinctions why is the life diversity in the warmer climates billions of times that in the much colder Artic and Antartic?